Today’s class was structured differently than usual, focusing more on discussion than lecture. We participated in an EdCamp, where we could move between different small group conversations based on topics that interested us. I joined a discussion about AI in education and what role it should or shouldn’t play in classrooms at different grade levels.
One key point that stood out in our conversation was the idea that AI should be implemented in ways that minimize misuse. I have found that there is often a clear misuse of the tool. I have experienced this semester some professors are very against it where on the other hand some are all to quick to put their work or topic through softwares to produce a product.
Another interesting theme that emerged was the perception of AI as “cheating.” Many of us were taught that using AI-generated content feels dishonest, especially when it replaces original thinking. While I don’t believe AI is inherently cheating, I do think it can encourage students to take an easier path rather than developing their own skills. For example, using AI to brainstorm ideas or refine wording is different from using it to generate entire essays or artwork. As future educators, I think it’s important to help students understand the difference between using AI as a tool versus relying on it as a crutch.
Reflecting on EdCamp as a whole, I really appreciate how student-led it is. It encourages discussion, critical thinking, and collaboration, which are all skills I want to foster in my own future classroom. I could see myself using a modified version of this activity, where students choose topics to explore and then teach each other what they’ve learned. It could also work as a review strategy before a test, where students identify areas they need help with and discuss them in small groups. Whether for content review, inquiry-based learning, or book discussions, I think EdCamp is a valuable and engaging tool that can be adapted for many different classroom contexts.